 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Gilbert v. Merchant, No. 05-3571,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, June 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The denial of an inmate's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S. § 2254 was affirmed because the absence of a parent by itself was not dispositive of the voluntariness of a juvenile's confession and the inmate did not identify other circumstances calling into question the voluntary nature of his confession.
|
|||||
| Perez v. Illinois, No. 05-4591,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, June 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The grant of summary judgment to the employer on the Title VII national origin discrimination claims was affirmed because the employee was permitted to answer all questions and had failed to show that he was treated differently from other candidates in terms of the scores assigned based on the answers given for the entire section.
|
|||||
| Reynolds v. Jamison, No. 06-2170,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, June 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In this § 1983 action, the grant of summary judgment to a police officer and plaintiff's ex--girlfriend was affirmed because the officer received, through his supervisor, credible information that plaintiff had allegedly violated a protective order and the officer could not be expected to believe plaintiff's declarations of innocence.
|
|||||
| United States v. Dinkins, No. 06-1789,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, June 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for theft by bank employee and aiding and abetting was affirmed because any error by district court in instructing jury on aiding and abetting and denying motion for acquittal due to lack of evidence on charge was harmless as evidence was sufficient to allow fact-finder to convict her as principal under 18 U.S.C.S. § 656.
|
|||||
| United States v. Wortman, No. 06-4168,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, June 8, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for violating 18 U.S.C.S. § 1519 was affirmed because the course of events suggested a woman fixed on keeping her boyfriend out of prison, even if it meant destroying evidence and although defendant characterized her act as something done "in the heat of the moment," a reasonable jury could, and did, disagree.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
