 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cooper v. IBM Pers. Pension Plan, No. 07-1767,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, June 25, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellees' Fed. R. App. P. 38 motion for sanctions against former attorney in firm that represented plaintiff in underlying action was granted and attorney's appeal from district court's denial of his motion for allocation of attorneys' fees was dismissed because attorney was not party to case and was not lawyer for any party.
|
|||||
| Hefley v. Vill. of Calumet Park, No. 06-3130,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, June 25, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The grant of summary judgment to the former employer on the employee's Title VII claim of reverse racial discrimination was affirmed because the employee could not show that he was meeting his employer's legitimate expectations because he did not dispute that annual firearms certification was mandatory and that he failed to qualify.
|
|||||
| Jackson v. Potter, No. 06-3393,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, June 25, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The judgment granting summary judgment to the employer on the former employee's Title VII claim that she was fired based on her religious beliefs as a Jehovah's Witness was affirmed because the district court correctly concluded that the employee's affidavit alone was insufficient to invoke equitable estoppel to excuse her untimely filing.
|
|||||
| Lott v. Pfizer, Inc., No. 06-3372,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, June 25, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant had objectively reasonable basis for seeking removal of plaintiffs' purported class action as no circuit court had rejected its argument that word "commenced" in Class Action Fairness Act meant date on which case was removed to federal court, district court erred by awarding plaintiffs attorneys' fees under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1447(c).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
