LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 7th Circuit Court of Appeals - June 26, 2007

  
Deich-Keibler v. Bank One, No. 06-3802, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, June 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Former employees of a division of an employer did not show antitrust injury in connection with the sale of the division to a purchaser, so they could not bring a claim under Ind. Code § 24-1-2-7. Nor did the sale or the employees' discharge after they refused the purchaser's job offers violate 29 U.S.C.S. § 1140 of ERISA.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Gautreaux v. Chi. Hous. Auth., No. 05-3578, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, June 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Public housing advocates who negotiated with a city housing authority with respect to waivers of certain restrictions embodied in a 35-year-old remedial decree were prevailing parties for purposes of 42 U.S.C.S. § 1988, because the housing authority had to change its position in order to win the advocates' approval of the waiver orders.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Malone v. Neilson, No. 05-4112, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, June 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Saylor v. Finnan, No. 07-1247, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, June 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Suarez v. Sacred Heart Hosp., No. 07-1036, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, June 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Hrobowski, No. 06-3307, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, June 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's convictions for being felon in possession of handgun and for knowingly possessing handgun with obliterated serial number were affirmed because factual questions he identified did not undermine sufficiency of evidence and his attacks on credibility of witnesses did not approach standard required to reconsider their credibility.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Lewis, No. 06-3781, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, June 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant was properly sentenced under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C.S. § 924(e), because his 1997 state conviction for delivery of a controlled substance constituted a "serious drug offense" as he was subject to an enhanced penalty of 30 years' imprisonment under Illinois' recidivism statute, 730 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/5-5-3(c)(8).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Zamecnik v. Abbco, Inc., No. 06-3609, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, June 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Because the employee failed to provide timely notice of his disability claim, and did not point to anything in the record to justify his 16-month delay, the appellate court affirmed the district court's dismissal of the employee's ERISA claims brought pursuant to 29 U.S.C.S. § 1132(a)(1)(B).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.