 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Dye v. Hennepin County, No. 05-1568,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ellis v. Evans, No. 04-3925,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Heryla v. Hennepin County, No. 05-1977,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Knieriem v. Group Health Plan, Inc., No. 05-1139,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Regardless of estate's labeling of its requests for relief as "restitution" and a "surcharge," where its decedent, then living, had not undergone and paid for medical treatment, estate sought compensatory damages, not equitable relief, for denial of insurance coverage. Compensatory damages were not available under 29 U.S.C.S. § 1132(a)(3)(B).
|
|||||
| Lupiani v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 04-1392,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where employees alleged that their employer violated ERISA, 29 U.S.C.S. § 1001 et seq., regarding plan provisions that made union-represented employees ineligible for certain benefits, the jurisdiction of the federal courts was not preempted by the jurisdiction of the NLRB because the specific claims were not inextricably intertwined with the NLRA.
|
|||||
| Murphy v. County of Hennepin, No. 05-1754,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Oertwig v. Hennepin County, No. 05-1564,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Pralutsky v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., No. 04-2409, No. 04-3239,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court erred in granting a plan participant summary judgment as the insurer's reliance on the absence of objective evidence for its denial of long-term disability benefits did not justify abandoning the deference normally accorded an ERISA plan administrator's decision. Under the normal standard, the administrator's decision was reasonable.
|
|||||
| Sizer v. County of Hennepin, No. 05-1470,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
