 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Lang, No. 05-1307,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Longwell, No. 05-1100,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant waived right to appeal determination that he was career offender under USSG § 4B1.1 where plea agreement included waiver of right to appeal sentence on any ground except for upward departure, sentence in excess of statutory maximum, or sentence in violation of law apart from USSG. Application of § 4B1.1 did not amount to upward departure.
|
|||||
| United States v. Obasi, No. 05-1125,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was convicted of fraud and money laundering, he was not entitled to relief on appeal, because he failed to detail the materials he sought for funding requests under the Criminal Justice Act, foreign bank records were properly admitted, and the prosecutor did not commit misconduct regarding testimony about an elderly investor.
|
|||||
| United States v. Stead, No. 05-2268,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly held that defendant's prior convictions for walkaway escapes constituted crimes of violence even though no violence was alleged in the indictment because all escapes, including walkway escapes, categorically were crimes of violence such that the court was not required to look to the underlying facts of the prior convictions.
|
|||||
| Wadlington v. United States, No. 04-3771,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
