 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Dunmire v. Morgan Stanley Dw, Inc., No. 06-1947,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the evidence did not show that a brokerage firm violated the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) when it served a demand letter on an investor's estranged wife since the information had lost its "nonpublic" character, all of the investor's state law claims failed as they were all predicated on the allegation that the firm violated the GLBA.
|
|||||
| Level 3 Communs., L.L.C. v. City of St. Louis, Nos. 06-1398/06-1459,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because court found insufficient evidence from the communications company of any actual or effective prohibition, let alone one that materially inhibited its operations, and because the company had not carried its burden of establishing a violation under 47 U.S.C.S. § 253(a), the district court's § 253(c) analysis was premature and was reversed.
|
|||||
| Skinner v. Missouri, No. 06-1512,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Snowden v. Poulan/Weed Eater, No. 06-2664,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Synergetics, Inc. v. Hurst, No. 06-1146,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment awarding compensatory and punitive damages against two former employees for trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, intentional interference with business relationships, and breach of fiduciary duty was affirmed because, inter alia, the actual damages award of $ 1,759,165 did not shock the court's conscience.
|
|||||
| United States v. Arechiga, No. 06-1287,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly imposed consecutive sentences following defendant's assault convictions because it was not abuse of discretion for district court to consider defendant's prior juvenile record as his history and characteristics were factors to be considered under 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a)(1) and auto theft was classified as crime of violence.
|
|||||
| United States v. Donnelly, No. 06-1838,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a trooper had a reasonable suspicion that defendant may have been transporting and using drugs, the detention of defendant while awaiting the arrival of a drug sniffing dog was reasonable because nothing in the record suggested that the trooper exercised suboptimal diligence in investigating his suspicion of drugs in defendant's vehicle.
|
|||||
| United States v. Fortune, No. 05-4277,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence was affirmed because he failed to rebut presumption of reasonableness that attached to guidelines sentence selected for drug count, and district court acknowledged its obligation to consider 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) factors and properly noted defendant's failure to change his ways after two prior drug convictions.
|
|||||
| United States v. Hinojosa, No. 06-1044,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
