 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Johnson, No. 05-3660,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court erred in granting a judgment of acquittal under Fed. R. Crim. P. 29 and a conditional motion for a new trial under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 after a jury convicted defendant of two firearms charges because the verdicts were not against the weight of the evidence and the evidence was sufficient to sustain both convictions.
|
|||||
| United States v. Kendall, No. 06-3044,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentence was affirmed because the sentencing court did not exceed the scope of a remand order because there was no limitation placed on its consideration of additional information to establish that defendant's DWI was a crime of violence which was needed to properly apply USSG § 4B1.1; also, nothing suggested that the sentence was unreasonable.
|
|||||
| United States v. Ontiveros-Carreon, No. 05-4226,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 5, 2007, Submitted , February 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 50-month prison sentence for illegally reentering the U.S. was reasonable under 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a)(1) based on his history of repeatedly reentering the U.S. illegally and the need to protect the public from future crimes in light of his prior violent felony conviction for aggravated indecent liberties with a minor.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
