 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| French v. Koch's Body Shop, No. 05-1131,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A body shop was properly granted summary judgment in a § 1983 action because procedural due process was not violated by its failure to provide a car buyer with pre-seizure notice of hearing but was satisfied by its post-removal notice to the title holders of record and a meaningful opportunity to challenge the decision to tow the car.
|
|||||
| Porter v. Williams, No. 05-1862,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a claim alleging wrongful death and civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983, summary judgment was improper on the issue of official immunity because a social worker was mandated to perform certain actions under a consent decree, and there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether these mandatory duties were performed.
|
|||||
| South Dakota v. United States DOI, No. 04-2309,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Sebastian, No. 05-2002,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court affirmed defendant's 46-month sentence for illegal reentry to the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C.S. § 1326(a). The disparity created by allowing sentence departures in some jurisdictions, other jurisdictions, that expedited immigration cases did not make defendant's sentence unreasonable.
|
|||||
| United States v. Williams, No. 05-2158,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
