Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	Federal Courts - 8th Circuit Court of Appeals - February 6, 2007
	Skillicorn v. Luebbers, No. 05-3729, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 6, 2007, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Prisoner's 28 U.S.C.S. § 2254 habeas petition was properly denied because state court did not violate due process in excluding psychiatrist's testimony after defense refused to permit discovery of his unprivileged file and did not unreasonably apply Strickland in finding that counsel was not ineffective in failing to develop mitigating evidence. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	United States v. Kiser, No. 06-2780, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 6, 2007, Filed View this case - free   Overview: A district court properly increased defendant's base offense level for distributing drugs near a school zone in addition to imposing an enhancement for possession of a firearm during relevant conduct, pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1(b)(1). Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	United States v. Mitchell, Nos. 06-2844/2419, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 6, 2007, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Defendant's 18 U.S.C.S. § 152(1) conviction was reversed because he could not be convicted of failing to disclose prepetition income and the denial of his motion to dismiss the § 152(3) charge was affirmed because defendant did not establish that jeopardy had attached based on a jury's failure to find that his statements were material. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.