 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Baptist Health v. Smith, No. 06-1601,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court erred in interpreting a letter from an employing physician to an employed physician as a clear expression of Employing's intent to indemnify against a loan repayment to a medical center. The letter was not sufficient to constitute an indemnity agreement under Arkansas law.
|
|||||
| Schwan's Sales Enters., Inc. v. SIG Pack, Inc., No. 06-1571,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an owner sought prejudgment interest on a breach of contract claim and the parties' contract contained a choice-of-law provision applying Wisconsin law, Minnesota law applied to the prejudgment interest issue because, inter alia, the issue of prejudgment interest was a procedural matter for conflict-of-laws purposes under Minnesota law.
|
|||||
| Twin Cities Galleries, LLC v. Media Arts Group, Inc., No. 06-1777,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Arbitration award which found that art gallery owners were not franchisees of marketers of art reproductions, based on law of state designated in parties' agreement, was improperly vacated based on violation of forum state's public policy, since standards of both states for determining whether owners paid franchise fee were virtually identical.
|
|||||
| United States v. Akers, No. 06-2804,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentence imposed against defendant, a former corrections officer, for smuggling cocaine into the corrections facility in violation of 18 U.S.C.S. § 1791 was not excessive because advisory sentencing range was 46 to 57 months and the trial court imposed a sentence of 46 months. Trial court properly applied U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2P1.2.
|
|||||
| United States v. Castaneda, No. 06-1712,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
