LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 8th Circuit Court of Appeals - February 13, 2006

  
Harris v. United States Postal Serv., No. 04-3678, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Lee v. Rheem Mfg. Co., No. 05-1558, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Kelly, No. 05-1527, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's sentence on a being a felon in possession of ammunition conviction was affirmed as the facts found by the jury and stated in a presentence report supported a variance from the advisory guideline range. The district court properly allowed a child's testimony and his tape-recorded statement after he refused to testify about the shooting.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Sandoval, No. 04-3763, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: District court did not plainly err in determining that amphetamine was properly reclassified as a Schedule II controlled substance for guidelines purposes, resulting in a statutory maximum of 20 years upon defendant's guilty plea to conspiring to distribute amphetamine.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  Copyright© 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.