 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Torres-Villalobos, No. 06-1876,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction of illegal reentry after deportation was affirmed because there was no abuse of discretion in the trial court's evidentiary rulings, but defendant's sentence was vacated because his prior conviction for second-degree manslaughter was not a "crime of violence" under 18 U.S.C.S. § 16, or an "aggravated felony" under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1326(b).
|
|||||
| United States v. Watson, No. 06-2836,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion for new trial was properly denied because defendant had not established ineffective assistance of trial counsel per se when his attorney was under investigation by state bar authorities for an unrelated matter while representing defendant, defendant was apprised of the situation, and defendant agreed to continued representation.
|
|||||
| United States v. Williams, No. 06-2448,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The order granting defendant's motion to suppress was reversed because the police could not have removed the drugs that defendant stashed near his genitals without making some "intimate contact" and the police refrained from searching defendant on a public street, and instead took him to the more private precinct parking lot.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
