 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Battle v. UPS, No. 04-4123/04-4128,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an employee with depression sought meeting agendas as reasonable accommodation, the employer was not entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the failure-to-accommodate claims under the ADA and Arkansas Civil Rights Act because, inter alia, evidence supported the jury's findings that the employee was disabled and his request was reasonable.
|
|||||
| United States v. Burgess, No. 05-2526,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence for possessing pseudoephedrine knowing it would be used to manufacture methamphetamine was remanded because the trial court committed clear error in finding drug quantity and in requiring proof of quantity beyond a reasonable doubt, since the Government only had to prove drug quantity by a preponderance of the evidence.
|
|||||
| United States v. Klingner, No. 05-3507,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly denied defendant's motion to withdraw a guilty plea as he was not denied effective assistance of counsel. Defendant's sentence for aiding and abetting clients in submitting false statements on a loan application was affirmed as he was not entitled to a mitigating role reduction.
|
|||||
| United States v. Reams, No. 05-2708,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, February 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm was affirmed because the denial of a subpoena for a jailhouse tape recording was not an abuse of discretion where the recording was cumulative since a letter by defendant's roommate had been received and the circumstances surrounding defendant's possession were unchallenged.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
