 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Antonelli v. Sanders, No. 06-2072,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Bradley v. James, No. 06-2283,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Police chief was properly granted summary judgment on public employee's claim of retaliation in violation of First Amendment because employee's statements that the chief was intoxicated were made during investigation of department's response to a criminal incident and, thus, pursuant to employee's official and professional duties as police officer.
|
|||||
| Leach v. Waterway Car Wash, No. 06-1931,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| McDowell v. Dawson, No. 06-1485,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Hale, No. 05-4211,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Mata-Peres, No. 06-1741, No. 06-2017,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Detective's testimony provided basis for district court's adoption of a supervisory/managerial role enhancement under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3B1.1(c) for defendant one. Court properly added criminal history points under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4A1.1(d), based on its findings concerning defendant two's status as probationer.
|
|||||
| United States v. Synowiecki, No. 06-2125,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although a district court failed to acknowledge the precise U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual ch. 7 revocation range applying to defendant's Grade C violations and criminal history category, his revocation sentence was upheld as reasonable because it was based on his history of supervised release violations and the need to protect society.
|
|||||
| United States v. Dalton, No. 06-2512,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Extent of a downward departure from defendant's mandatory minimum sentence for a drug conspiracy was unreviewable and the district court properly determined the extent of the departure using only the substantial assistance factors under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5K1.1 and not the 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) factors.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
