 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Higgins v. Gonzales, No. 06-2556,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The grant of summary judgment to the employer on the Title VII claims of discrimination and retaliation was affirmed because the employee's claimed adverse employment actions fell far short of constituting an adverse employment action; she pointed to no evidence her title, salary and benefits changed or that her job responsibilities decreased.
|
|||||
| Martin v. Hayne, No. 05-4443,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Martin v. Unknown Serrell, No. 06-2163,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Stanko v. Glaser, No. 06-2035,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court reversed order dismissing pretrial detainee's complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1915A. Given the dearth of a record in the case, the appellate court did not know how much access the detainee was given to the law library or to assistance in the law. Appellate court could not say detainee's legal-access claim was frivolous.
|
|||||
| United States v. Adair, No. 06-1584,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In imposing sentence following defendant's conviction for violating 21 U.S.C.S. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846, defendant was properly denied minimal-participant reduction under USSG § 3B1.2(b) because he was found with firearm and 162 pounds of marijuana, and he drove from Arkansas to California to pick up drugs and was observed loading them into his truck.
|
|||||
| United States v. Bern, No. 06-1746,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Haskins, No. 06-1924,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's appeal from Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) sentence was dismissed because although he framed issue as sentence's overall reasonableness, he was appealing district court's ruling on motion to reduce sentence, and because defendant did not satisfy criteria of 18 U.S.C.S. § 3742(a)(1)-(4), appellate court lacked jurisdiction to hear his appeal.
|
|||||
| United States v. Wendt, Nos. 06-3582, 06-3808,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Wicks, No. 05-3751,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court's finding that defendant was not eligible for safety valve relief under 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(f) and USSG § 5C1.2 was not clearly erroneous. Defendant recanted his prior statements and thus never provided complete, truthful information to the government.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
