 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Canny v. Dr. Pepper/Seven-Up Bottling Group, Inc., No. 05-1491,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an employee with an eye disease was not reassigned, the employer was not entitled to judgment as a matter of law regarding the failure to accommodate claims under the ADA and the Iowa Civil Rights Act, because, inter alia, there was sufficient evidence that the employee could perform the essential functions of two positions.
|
|||||
| Gould v. Faver, No. 05-1846,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a brief order, court affirmed a trial court's rulings in favor of defendant's in civil suit brought under 42 U.S.C.S. §§ 1983 and 1985(3); a private citizen lacked standing to challenge state actors' failure to prosecute another, which also did not raise a cognizable federal claim, and private actors were not liable under 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983.
|
|||||
| United States v. Johnson, No. 05-2146,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In light of the district court's reasons for admitting the evidence, and its instructions to the jury to consider the stories as evidence of defendant's predisposition and inherent tendency to commit the crimes charged, it was error for the court to admit the evidence of the stories about the rape of two teenage girls under Fed. R. Evid. 404(b).
|
|||||
| United States v. Littrell, No. 05-2647,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A confidential informant's reliability was sufficiently established in a search warrant affidavit, which stated that the drug task force investigator had worked with the informant for three years and that he had provided accurate and reliable information that the investigator had found to be true in effecting felony arrests.
|
|||||
| United States v. Walker, No. 05-3004,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's five-month prison sentence for conspiracy to commit financial aid fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C.S. § 371 was reasonable; sentence fell near bottom of range calculated under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual and trial court noted its obligation to, and stated that it did, consider factors set forth in 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
