 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Maldonado, No. 05-2917,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 15-month consecutive sentence for revocation of his parole on conviction of a subsequent offense was affirmed because the sentence was at the low point of the range under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7B1.4(a) and was presumptively reasonable, and the district court gave consideration to the 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) factors.
|
|||||
| United States v. Mennen, No. 05-3321,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 87-month sentence on his plea of guilty to manufacturing and attempting to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C.S. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B), and 846 was affirmed because the district court's decision not to depart on the basis of defendant's physical condition was unreviewable and the sentence was not unreasonable.
|
|||||
| United States v. Stevens, No. 05-1744,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 16, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Probable cause supported a no-knock search warrant under the Fourth Amendment because a confidential informant, who had given reliable information on numerous prior occasions, personally observed drugs and guns in the residence and an officer's surveillance confirmed activity consistent with drug trafficking.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
