 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Youngman, No. 06-2333,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that his right to a complete, adequate, and fair trial was jeopardized, failed to show that a statement by the trial judge was prejudicial, and failed to show that the district court abused its discretion in declining defendant's proposed jury instruction, the district court was affirmed.
|
|||||
| Yeng Thao v. City of St. Paul, No. 06-2339,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was properly entered against co-trustees of decedent's estate as to their disability discrimination claims under 42 U.S.C.S. § 12132, 29 U.S.C.S. § 794(a), and Minn. Stat. § 363A.12, subd. 1. Police officers had no reason to believe, when they entered home, that paranoid schizophrenic decedent presented danger to himself or others.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
