 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cooley v. Burger, No. 05-3161,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner was not entitled to habeas relief under 28 U.S.C.S. § 2254 from his forgery conviction under Iowa law. Evidence at trial was sufficient to show that defendant knew the check he cashed was forged. Petitioner presented no evidence of innocent possession. Indeed, petitioner did not rebut any of the unchallenged testimony against him.
|
|||||
| Kashimawo-Spikes v. United States Bancorp, No. 04-4063,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Laughlin v. Schriro, No. 04-2101,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mathis v. Mathes, No. 04-3569,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Moon v. Chicot County Ark. Legal Assocs., No. 05-2294,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Pralutsky v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., No. 04-2409 / 04-3239,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Simpson v. Merchs. & Planters Bank, No. 04-3972,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where appellate court had previously held that jobs did not need to be identical to be considered under the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C.S. § 206, but that they only had to be substantially equal, the court rejected an employer's argument that the job held by the employee and the one held by a male co-worker were not the same and therefore not equal.
|
|||||
| United States v. Alexander, No. 05-2305,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence for concealing work activity from the SSA was affirmed where, because a district court applied the USSG in an advisory manner, the district court was only required to find the amount of loss by a preponderance of evidence, and the district court's method for calculating the amount of loss was reasonable.
|
|||||
| United States v. Anderson, No. 05-3217,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sufficient evidence supported defendant's convictions for three robberies. The surveillance tape of each bank robbery showed the same man, identified as defendant, robbing each of the three banks, and each of the three victim tellers positively identified defendant as the person who robbed them.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
