 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Avula v. Comm'r, No. 06-2146,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Commissioner of Internal Revenue was properly allowed to collect on taxpayers' interest liability, as the taxpayers were barred under 26 U.S.C.S. § 6330(c)(2)(B) from challenging their underlying tax liability at a collection due process hearing; they had been given notice and an opportunity to dispute the underlying liability.
|
|||||
| Carrington v. City of Des Moines, No. 06-1801,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The grant of summary judgment to the employer on the retaliation claims under Iowa Code § 216.11(2) and 42 U.S.C.S. § 2000e-3(a) was affirmed; the employee didn't present the employer with a statement alleging "harassment" and "retaliation" until after the employer began investigating his job performance and after the pre-disciplinary hearing.
|
|||||
| Shields v. USPS, No. 06-2004,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Stewart v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 196, No. 06-1870,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The grant of summary judgment to the employer on the employee's claims under the anti-retaliation provisions of the ADEA and ADA was affirmed because the employee's attempt to compress the six-month gap in time failed because her interaction with the employer continued throughout the six months.
|
|||||
| United States v. Andes, No. 05-4394,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Pegues, No. 06-2187,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Poe, No. 06-2513,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's appeal from a judgment revoking his supervised release was remanded back to the district court for further development of the record. Defendant had challenged validity of Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(c)(2)(A) waiver, which resulted in change of his supervised release terms. District court had not made findings or ruled as to waiver's validity.
|
|||||
| Whitebox Convertible Arbitrage Partners, L.P. v. IVAX Corp., No. 06-2622,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Corporation that issued convertible notes under an indenture agreement was not obligated to pay investors a make-whole premium for converted notes because the agreement provided for such a premium only upon conversion within a 30-day period after the corporation announced a merger and the investors admittedly converted their notes pre-merger.
|
|||||
| Ziemski v. Ziemski (In re Ziemski), No. 06-2041,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
