LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 8th Circuit Court of Appeals - March 31, 2006

  
Box v. Principi, No. 05-2060, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A former employee failed to establish race discrimination or retaliation by her former employer, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.S. § 2000e et seq. The employee did not suffer any adverse employment action because she did not experience any change in salary or benefits, and she was not denied job training.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Carroll v. Nat'l Postal Mail Handlers Union, No. 05-1982, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Moody v. Colson Caster Corp., No. 05-2879, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Ford, No. 05-2164, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Goodall, No. 04-3767, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Denial of a motion for acquittal and defendant's conviction for conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine were supported by sufficient evidence, including large amounts of physical evidence, such as methamphetamine mixtures in different stages, in his garage and testimony that witnesses cooked methamphetamine there with his permission.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Goody, No. 05-2483, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A district court's imposition of a 72-month sentence for defendant's violation of 21 U.S.C.S. §§ 841(b)(1)(A)(viii) and 846 was vacated, and the case was remanded because the use of the 72-month sentence of another member of the conspiracy as a basis for sentencing defendant was an error.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Key, No. 05-3062, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Mahasin, No. 05-1484, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Under Fed. R. Evid. 403, trial court should have accepted defendant's stipulation regarding previous convictions. Nonetheless, the properly admitted evidence of guilt, as to assaulting an Assistant U.S. Attorney engaged in official duties, was so overwhelming it was clear beyond a reasonable doubt that improper use of admission was harmless error.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Ollie, No. 05-2503, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Denial of motion to suppress was reversed. Failure to advise defendant of Miranda rights required suppression of his initial oral confession; Government failed to meet burden on matter of deliberateness--whether belated Miranda warnings were deliberate tactic employed to maximize chances of eliciting confession--so written confession was excluded.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Patterson, No. 04-3051, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, March 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.