 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Parker v. Porter, No. 06-2063,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ruminer v. GMC, No. 06-2192,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Vehicle manufacturer was properly granted summary judgment in driver's product liability suit alleging that defects in occupant protection system caused his injuries because he offered no evidence regarding existence of specific defect in protection system, requiring speculation as to whether it was defective at time it left manufacturer's control.
|
|||||
| United States v. Ferrer-Montoya, No. 06-3751,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Search of false compartment in defendant's vehicle did not violate Fourth Amendment as it did not exceed scope of defendant's consent to search vehicle for drugs because he placed no limitations on consent, officer believed scarred screws concealed compartment, compartment was opened in minimally intrusive manner, and defendant did not object.
|
|||||
| United States v. Knott, No. 06-3202,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. McCoy, No. 06-4197,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly denied a pretrial suppression motion filed by defendant, who later pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography. Search warrant affidavit established probable cause to search defendant's computer, but not his car. The good faith exception to the U.S. Const. amend. IV exclusionary rule applied with regard to search of car.
|
|||||
| United States v. Thomas, No. 06-3055,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's appeal from his 18 U.S.C.S. §§ 922(g)(1), (k), 924(a)(1)(b), (2), firearm possession convictions and within-guidelines sentence was denied. The evidence supported district court's finding that he constructively possessed shotgun. District court properly adopted enhancements under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual §§ 4B1.2, 2K2.1(b)(5).
|
|||||
| United States v. Norris, No. 04-2073,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant did not show that the plea agreement specifically contemplated pre-plea performance or that the government had taken unfair advantage of its withdrawal from the agreement, district court's order granting defendant's motion for specific performance of the plea agreement and dismissing the superseding indictment was vacated.
|
|||||
| United States v. Proell, No. 06-3324,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeals court rejected defendant's challenge to denial of suppression motion and affirmed his 26 U.S.C.S. §§ 5861(d), 5871, 18 U.S.C.S. §§ 922(g)(3), 924(a)(2), and drug-related convictions. "Good faith" exception applied to first warrant-based search of defendant's property. Two additional searches resulted from evidence found during first search.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
