 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Fults v. Sanders, No. 05-3490,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: BOP was properly ordered to consider whether to transfer an inmate to a community corrections center because a BOP regulation, 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.20-.21, removed its opportunity to exercise its discretion on an individual basis to all inmates not serving the last 10 percent of their sentences and conflicted with 18 U.S.C.S. § 3621(b).
|
|||||
| Guy Carpenter & Co. v. John B. Collins Assocs., No. 05-3465,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not abuse discretion in denying part of employer's request for preliminary injunction which sought to stop former employees from breaching non-solicitation agreements; damages were adequate remedy for breach because clients who left employer could be identified, and damages resulting from loss of clients could be calculated.
|
|||||
| Hitchcock v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., No. 05-1901,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee was not entitled to relief under the Minnesota Whistleblower Statute, Minn. Stat. § 181.932, because she did not show that she reported any alleged illegalities to blow the whistle on the employer and she did not inform the employer that her refusal to obey an order was based on her belief that the order was illegal.
|
|||||
| La Tour v. City of Fayetteville, No. 03-2824,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Even though an ordinance, which prohibited flashing or blinking electronic signs, was not enforced to prohibit flashing time and temperature signs, the ordinance was content-neutral and was narrowly tailored to serve the city's significant interest of traffic safety; therefore, it was constitutional as applied.
|
|||||
| Rousan v. Roper, No. 04-3827,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| T.L. v. United States, No. 04-4155,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeals court affirmed the district court's conclusion that plaintiff had a duty to exercise reasonable diligence in determining the cause of her baby's brain injury, and because she failed to file an administrative claim under the FTCA within two years after the claim accrued, her action was barred, and there was no basis for equitable tolling.
|
|||||
| United States v. Gurley, No. 04-2627,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 6, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Moss, No. 05-2700,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Poe, No. 05-2914,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 6, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for violating 18 U.S.C.S. § 922(g)(1) was affirmed because the district court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury on his proposed affirmative defense of justification.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
