 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cox v. Sugg, No. 06-2311,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 27, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: University president and others were entitled to qualified immunity from the student's 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983 claims because she submitted insufficient evidence that any of these defendants acted on behalf of the university with the requisite culpability to cause the violation by a professor of the student's right to be free from sexual harassment.
|
|||||
| Ferguson v. United States, No. 06-1774,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 27, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Executive was authorized to sign checks and disburse corporate funds, and had the authority to pay the airline's excise taxes without the board of director's approval; thus, he was properly found to be responsible person under 26 U.S.C.S. § 6672, despite the executive's allegations that the board ordered him not to pay the taxes.
|
|||||
| White v. Riverview Sch. Dist., No. 05-2920,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 27, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants were properly granted summary judgment as to a former school employee's Title VII and 42 U.S.C.S. § 12112(a) discrimination claims. Employee did not rebut legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons proffered by defendants for employment decisions or show that she was disabled or that she could perform essential functions of her custodial job.
|
|||||
| Otter Tail Power Co. v. Surface Transp. Bd., No. 06-1962/06-2412,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Power company waived its challenge to the test applied by the Surface Transportation Board to determine whether the rate charged by the railroad was reasonable under 49 U.S.C.S. § 10701(a) because the company's arguments lacked the required forceful presentation necessary to give the railroad and the Board adequate notice.
|
|||||
| United States v. Wilson, No. 06-1765,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, May 1, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court enforced an appeal waiver in defendant's plea agreement because the record reflected that defendant understood and voluntarily accepted the terms of the plea agreement, including the appeal waiver, and there was no support for a contention that the government breached the plea agreement.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
