 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Smith v. Outlaw, Nos. 05-2212/2772,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Stone v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., No. 05-1885,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an ERISA case, the court reversed and remanded for entry of judgment in favor of the insured because the parties' settlement agreement was ambiguous as both parties' interpretations were reasonable, but because the insurer drafted the settlement agreement, the insured's interpretation prevailed.
|
|||||
| United States v. Bistrup, No. 05-2603, No. 05-2644,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the evidence was sufficient to uphold the wife's convictions, because the district court did not abuse its discretion in its evidentiary rulings, and because there was no reversible error in the husband's sentencing, the judgments below were affirmed in a case where, inter alia, both defendants were convicted of mail fraud and bank fraud.
|
|||||
| United States v. Nevarez-Sanchez, No. 05-3245,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court reviewed a conviction based upon the sufficiency of the evidence by viewing the evidence in light most favorable to verdict, and would reverse only if no reasonable jury could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Evidence was sufficient to sustain defendant's conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm.
|
|||||
| United States v. Quezada, No. 05-3254,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 10, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Deputy's entry into the apartment acting as a community caretaker did not violate the Fourth Amendment because he had a reasonable belief that an emergency was at hand. Because the deputy had a lawful basis for entering the apartment, the shotgun that he saw protruding from beneath defendant was admissible under the plain-view doctrine.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
