 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Martin v. Missouri, No. 04-3941,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In Title VII case, district court properly granted summary judgment to defendants on plaintiff's claims that adverse actions were taken against her based on her race and retaliation for filing complaints with EEOC and state humans right agency; defendant employer provided legitimate nonretaliatory and nondiscriminatory reasons for adverse actions.
|
|||||
| United States ex rel. Joshi v. St. Luke's Hosp., Inc., No. 05-2445,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 12, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Erwin, No. 05-1649,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sufficient evidence supported defendant's conviction; district court expressly took into account the inconsistencies and discrepancies in witnesses' testimony, but nonetheless found there was sufficient credible testimony to find defendant had conspired to distribute more than fifty grams of crack cocaine during the period alleged in indictment.
|
|||||
| United States v. Lopez-Ramirez, No. 05-1807,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Drake v. Koss, No. 05-1464,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Goods v. Crown Ctr. Complex, No. 05-1508,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Arteaga-Montoya, No. 05-1902, No. 05-2204,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants' 48- and 42-month sentences for violating 21 U.S.C.S. § 843(b) were reasonable; but for the statutory maximum, defendants would have faced much longer sentences under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual, and one defendant stipulated to a reduction of two, rather than three, levels for acceptance of responsibility.
|
|||||
| Waring v. Austin (In re Austin), No. 05-1138,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
