 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Norberg v. Labor Ready, Inc., No. 05-3454,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Child suffered injuries to his hand from paper shredder at mother's workplace. Jury verdict for defendant was affirmed as there was evidence to support ruling that res ipsa loquitur did not apply because machine was not under defendant's exclusive control, and box of toys alleged to have attracted child was in a different cubicle than shredder.
|
|||||
| Ochoa-Carrillo v. Gonzales, No. 04-2038,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 25, 2006_, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Powell v. Yellow Book USA, Inc., No. 05-2465,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff pointed to instances where a coworker talked about her (the coworker's) sexual exploits outside the office, described particular fantasies she harbored regarding other workers, and propositioned plaintiff for sex; however, the sexual harassment plaintiff experienced was not so severe or pervasive as to alter the terms of her employment.
|
|||||
| Tostado v. Carlson, No. 05-1053,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Bledsoe, No. 05-2350,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not clearly err in imposing obstruction of justice enhancement under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3C1.1 after finding, based on an officer's testimony, that a false name and social security number given during booking significantly hindered defendant's prosecution until his apprehension a year after his mistaken release.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
