 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Holland v. Sam's Club, No. 06-1321,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, May 25, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The grant of summary judgment to the employer on the Title VII gender discrimination claim was affirmed; because the employee's transfer from operating a forklift to being a stocker in electronics involved no change in pay or benefits and only minor changes in working conditions, the transfer did not constitute an adverse employment action.
|
|||||
| United States v. Goodwin, No. 06-2502,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, May 25, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not err in resentencing defendant to the same 87-month sentence that it had initially imposed because the initial sentence was reversed, along with a co-defendant's sentence, due to concerns about the disparity between sentences for similarly situated co-conspirators. The remand did not limit the sentencing court's discretion.
|
|||||
| United States v. Holthaus, No. 06-2843,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, May 25, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court correctly determined defendant's violation of 18 U.S.C.S. § 152(3) directly and proximately harmed a bankruptcy trustee because the trustee worked more than 50 uncompensated hours as a result of the violation. Thus, the order requiring defendant to pay the trustee pursuant to the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act was appropriate.
|
|||||
| United States v. Lozano, No. 05-4076, No. 05-4355,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, May 25, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not err in applying USSG § 5G1.3(b) and refusing to award defendant credit for the time he served on a state escape offense because that offense was not factored into defendant's criminal history calculation, and did not result in the imposition of an obstruction enhancement or any other increase in defendant's sentence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
