 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Kedir v. Gonzales, No. 05-1670,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition for review of a BIA order which summarily affirmed an IJ's denial of asylum was granted. The IJ's adverse credibility determination was not entitled to deference because it was based on an erroneous evaluation of petitioner's testimony. The IJ's finding also infected the IJ's inquiry whether she had a reasonable fear of future persecution.
|
|||||
| Moore-El v. Luebbers, No. 05-1159,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inmate's 28 U.S.C.S. § 2254 habeas petition was properly denied because he procedurally defaulted an ineffective assistance of counsel claim by failing to renew it on appeal from the denial of a Mo. Sup. Ct. R. 29.15(a) post-conviction motion and default was not excused by his belief that a state court's rulings hampered development of the claim.
|
|||||
| Taylor v. Crawford, No. 06-1397,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An inmate's claim against prison officials that the state's lethal injection protocol violated the Eighth Amendment was remanded for the limited purpose of permitting a continuation of an expedited evidentiary hearing, in which he was prevented from presenting the testimony of an expert who could not appear before the inmate's execution.
|
|||||
| Thompson v. Booker, No. 05-3467,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Montesinos-Montiel, No. 05-2602,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Tucker, No. 05-1960,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's 70-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute and possess methamphetamine was reasonable because it comported with the plea agreement, the district court showed leniency by sentencing at the bottom of the advisory guidelines range, and the criminal history points were based on sentences imposed within 10 years.
|
|||||
| United States v. Turner, No. 04-4185,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT, April 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant who pled guilty to drug possession was not entitled to plain-error relief for her sentencing under mandatory guidelines because, given the identical alternative discretionary sentence, the record did not establish a reasonable probability that the district court would have imposed a more favorable sentence under advisory guidelines.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
