 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Burnett v. Resurgent Capital Servs. (In re Burnett), No. 04-15503,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where none of the arguments debtors presented to the appeals court were presented to the bankruptcy appellate panel (BAP), and debtors did not explain why they failed to present their arguments to the BAP, and they did not argue that exceptional circumstances justified their omission, debtors waived those arguments.
|
|||||
| Calderon-Ortiz v. Gonzales, No. 03-72653,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Carson Harbor Vill., Ltd. v. County of L.A., No. 04-55024,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because plaintiff failed to comply with the public comment requirement and feasibility study requirements of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan before it undertook remedial action for cleanup of tar-like slag material, it could not recover damages from defendant under CERCLA.
|
|||||
| Casarez-Gonzalez v. Gonzales, No. 04-75085,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Castellanos v. Gonzales, No. 04-74347,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Castillo-Preciado v. Gonzales, No. 04-76743,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Chen v. Gonzales, No. 04-73561,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a very brief order, the court denied a petition for review of the denial of aliens' application for asylum and withholding of removal; aliens did not provide objective evidence supporting one alien's stated fear that, if removed to China, she would be sterilized because she had a second child while living in the United States.
|
|||||
| Coates v. Agilent Techs., Inc., No. 03-17306,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendants, the sponsors of two pension plans, had discretion to merge those plans and the decision to do so did not implicate defendants' fiduciary duties and plaintiff conceded that the merged plan was properly invested, plaintiff failed to state a claim for a breach of fiduciary duties.
|
|||||
| Davtian v. Gonzales, No. 03-73960,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an asylum applicant claimed she feared persecution in Armenia because her mother was from Azerbaijan but the applicant had returned to Armenia for months-long visits at least three times without incident, substantial evidence supported IJ's finding that the applicant was not credible.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
