 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Prakash v. Gonzales, No. 05-71470,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported the denial of asylum and withholding of removal because an alien failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution based on ethnic Fijians threatening the alien to leave his house, difficulties finding work in Fiji, and an incident in which an ethnic Fijian punched him.
|
|||||
| Reiner v. Remington, No. 06-55726,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: 28 U.S.C.S. § 2254 petition properly was dismissed because petitioner was not "in custody" at time he filed petition, as required by § 2254(d), when he filed petition after probation expired. Once sentence completely expired, collateral consequences of conviction, including his disbarment, did not render him "in custody" for purposes of § 2254(d).
|
|||||
| Salazar v. Gonzales, No. 06-72267,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sanchez v. Runnels, No. 05-55590,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sembhi v. Gonzales, No. 04-72803,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because past persecution and well-founded fear were standards for asylum and withholding of removal and not for CAT relief and alien's brief to BIA addressed only his claims that evidence presented to IJ established past persecution and well-founded fear of future persecution, alien did not exhaust administrative remedies with respect to CAT claim.
|
|||||
| Sharma v. Gonzales, No. 05-70125,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Cumulative effect of repeated thievery and death threats from ethnic Fijians and other events, including assault by Fijian with knife, supported past persecution claim, which entitled alien to presumption of well-founded fear of future persecution. Country conditions had not changed sufficiently to rebut presumption, so she was eligible for asylum.
|
|||||
| Singh v. Gonzales, No. 05-73832,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Singh v. Gonzales, No. 05-73709,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sundar v. Gonzales, No. 05-74258,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported IJ's denial of asylum application because alien failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution based on minor assaults and theft by ethnic Fijians. Because the alien failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily failed to establish eligibility for withholding of removal.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
