 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Huynh v. Castro, No. 04-55810,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a very brief order, without stating its analysis, the court upheld the denial of an inmate's habeas petition; prosecutor's comments allegedly vouching for a witness did not so infect the trial that they denied the inmate due process.
|
|||||
| Jerden v. Amstutz, No. 04-35889,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Amended
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court abused its discretion by striking key portions of a patient's expert's testimony that supported the patient's negligence claim, in response to the neurosurgeon's untimely motion to strike, without providing the patient an opportunity to correct the foundational requirement of knowledge of local medical standards.
|
|||||
| Jerden v. Amstutz, No. 04-35889,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Jin Wu v. Gonzales, No. 04-76744,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: IJ's adverse credibility determination and denial of asylum and withholding of removal was supported by substantial evidence, including the alien's failure to corroborate his claim that he practiced Christianity and the inconsistencies in his testimony regarding who informed him that he was fired after he organized a demonstration.
|
|||||
| Karshe v. Gonzales, No. 04-70696,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Keane v. Artz, No. 05-15220,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Kelava v. Gonzales, No. 03-73689,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Kelava v. Gonzales, No. 03-73689,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Amended
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was no retroactive effect in applying the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 elimination of relief under § 212(c) (former 8 U.S.C.S. § 1182(c)) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to an alien who clearly engaged in terrorist activity, 8 U.S.C.S. § 1182(a)(3)(B)(iii)(II), before IIRIRA's enactment.
|
|||||
| Liang v. Gonzales, No. 03-72961,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
