 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Adkins, No. 05-50879, No. 05-50880,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Castellanos-Flores, No. 06-10431,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Castro, No. 06-50085,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Dixon, No. 05-10726,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because suspicionless search of person known by police officers to be California parolee subject to Cal. Penal Code § 3067(a) did not violate Fourth Amendment, defendant's challenge to officers' warrantless search of vehicle based on lack of reasonable suspicion failed, as he was subject to § 3067(a) and officers were aware of his parole status.
|
|||||
| United States v. Hernandez-Castro, No. 06-10074,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was ineligible for safety valve relief under 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(f) when he had two criminal history points, and district court had no discretion to adjust those points for purposes of safety valve eligibility. Section 3553(f)(1)'s criminal history point limitation was not, by virtue of its reference to USSG, rendered advisory by Booker.
|
|||||
| United States v. Martinez-Venegas, No. 06-30232,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Mendia-Carbajal, No. 06-10419,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Murillo, No. 06-10302,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Pastrana, No. 05-50591,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although the mandatory nature of safety-valve relief under 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(f) survived Booker, defendant was not eligible for safety-valve relief by operation of § 3553(f)(1) because he conceded that he had more than one criminal history point.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
