 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Lin v. Gonzales, No. 04-70422,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence did not support IJ's finding that documentary evidence was not credible in a Chinese citizen's application seeking asylum based on forcible sterilization, 8 U.S.C.S. § 1101(a)(42); without objective support in record, the IJ's speculations and suspicions could not be regarded as reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence.
|
|||||
| Lu v. Gonzales, No. 04-73976,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mancebo v. Adams, No. 04-17167,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where evidence that state inmate had offered to take a polygraph examination played a minor role in his criminal trial and there was sufficient other evidence to support the inmate's conviction, the inmate was not entitled to habeas relief under § 2254 based on his attorney's failure to object to admission of evidence of the inmate's statement.
|
|||||
| Marin-Batres v. Gonzales, No. 04-76603,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Martinez-Ibarra v. Gonzales, Nos. 03-74736, 04-75502,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an alien's failure to file the motion to reopen before the voluntary departure period expired rendered him statutorily ineligible under 8 U.S.C.S. § 1229c(d) for that relief, BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying the alien's motion to reopen.
|
|||||
| Melake v. Gonzales, No. 04-75095,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Minhas v. Gonzales, No. 04-76221,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Murnikovas v. Gonzales, No. 04-71083,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Alien's allegation that he was persecuted because his membership in a particular social group--persons who testified in trials against criminals and were threatened for supporting the authorities--failed to establish that he was persecuted based on a protected ground; thus, court upheld the denial of his application for withholding of removal.
|
|||||
| Nghiem v. Agha (In re Nghiem), No. 04-16749,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
