 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Andrews v. McIntyre, No. 04-16859,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| B. Braun Med., Inc. v. Rogers, No. 03-56193, No. 04-56836,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Counterclaim for misappropriation of trade secrets was not barred by statute of limitations, as corporation's action tolled limitations period and counterclaim was filed during pendency of corporation's action. Trial court violated Seventh Amendment in reducing the jury's compensatory damage award without affording defendants the option of retrial.
|
|||||
| Birks v. Lamarque, No. 04-16284,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Carrigan v. United States (In re Carrigan), No. 05-15344,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Corrigan v. Dale, No. 04-36002,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a judge's attorney failed to file a separate motion for sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 and to comply with the "safe harbor" provisions of Rule 11(c)(1)(A), the district court abused its discretion by awarding the judge attorney fees even if a driver's claims against the judge were frivolous.
|
|||||
| Dimarzio v. Jacobs, No. 05-15750,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Garcia v. Gonzales, No. 04-73634,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hawthorne Sav. F.S.B. v. Koken, No. 03-55548, No. 03-55611,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hawthorne Sav. F.S.B. v. Reliance Ins. Co., No. 03-55548, No. 03-55611,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 13, 2006, Amended
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although Pennsylvania was a reciprocal state under the Uniform Insurers Liquidation Act, Cal. Ins. Code § 1064.1-12, for purposes of California law, a California state court would not stay its proceedings under the UILA but would have decided the merits of the dispute.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
