 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Jin Zhong v. Gonzales, No. 04-71898,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Kahre v. Swiss Casinos of Am., Inc., No. 05-15401,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Kaur v. Gonzales, No. 04-74359,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported IJ's findings that an asylum applicant failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution; a two-day detention did not reach the level of persecution, and the alien remained in India for one year without incident following her husband's detention.
|
|||||
| Madison v. Tulalip Tribes, No. 03-35464,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a challenged permit to discharge storm water into waters of the United States had expired and a new permit had been issued, and plaintiff's NEPA challenge to the permit relied on an argument that the challenged permit was a regulation, a decision on that issue would not pertain to the new permit and the case was moot.
|
|||||
| Morris v. Giurbino, No. 04-56359,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A 28 U.S.C.S. § 2254 habeas corpus petition was properly denied because an inmate's Sixth Amendment right to counsel during a line-up was not denied where the inmate did not participate in a line-up, and his due process rights were not denied by the denial of his request for a second line-up because he had no constitutional right to a line-up.
|
|||||
| N. Cal. River Watch v. Humboldt Petroleum, Inc., No. 04-153 81,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Environmental group's action against petroleum company alleging claims under Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et seq. and under Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C.S. § 6901 et seq., was barred by res judicata based on preclusive effect of consent judgment that settled action filed by county district attorney against petroleum company.
|
|||||
| Qwest Corp. v. City of Surprise, No. 04-16940,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Telecommunications service provider's challenge to Arizona cities' licensing and franchise ordinances was rendered moot by amendments that brought the ordinances in line with Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 9-582(E). Under Tax Injunction Act, 28 U.S.C.S. § 1341, court lacked jurisdiction to consider the provider's challenge to charges that constituted taxes.
|
|||||
| Richard v. Cal. Dep't of Corr., No. 03-15801,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Rodriguez Ortiz v. Gonzales, No. 04-74518,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
