LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 9th Circuit Court of Appeals - January 17, 2007

  
Flores-Perez v. Gonzales, No. 05-70326, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Garcia-Leal v. Gonzales, No. 05-71991, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Grigoryan v. Gonzales, No. 05-72049, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Grimes v. BART, No. 05-16839, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Hopkins v. Ali, No. 05-16794, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Islam v. Gonzales, No. 04-75729, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Juarez v. Gonzales, No. 05-70748, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Kaur v. Gonzales, No. 04-72908, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: The Board of Immigration Appeals improperly summarily affirmed an IJ's order denying the applications of an alien, a native and citizen of India, for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the CAT because substantial evidence did not support adverse credibility findings, including that the alien was evasive concerning her rape by police.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Khubeeva v. Gonzales, No. 05-75073, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: The BIA's adverse credibility determination was based solely on a forensic expert's testimony and report, but any information that the expert mistakenly offered as to the authenticity of a wife's birth certificate was not reliable because the expert had only examined their marriage certificate and the husband's birth certificate, not the wife's.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Kohli v. Gonzales, No. 05-72761, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Although signature and title of issuing official on alien's Notice to Appear were not legible, IJ properly denied the alien's motion to terminate the removal proceedings; the alleged defect did not deprive Immigration Court of jurisdiction, and it did not prejudice the alien because she received all information required by 8 U.S.C.S. § 1229(a)(1).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.