 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Singh v. Gonzales, No. 05-73914,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported denial of asylum based on BIA's finding that harm suffered by alien, an ethnically Indian native and citizen of Fiji, at hands of native Fijians did not constitute past persecution on account of ethnicity. As alien did not establish eligibility for asylum, he did not establish eligibility for withholding of removal.
|
|||||
| Smith v. United States, No. 06-35067,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Busane, No. 06-50016,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Hess, No. 06-10065,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Pike, No. 05-30528,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court erred in requiring clear and convincing proof in declining to impose a sentence enhancement for weapon possession under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2B3.1(b)(2)(C) after defendant pleaded guilty to bank robbery under 18 U.S.C.S. § 2113(a) because the totality of the circumstances showed that a heightened burden was unwarranted.
|
|||||
| Valadez v. Gonzales, No. 05-70432,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Vichis-Chaves v. Gonzales, No. 04-75520,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Xue v. Gonzales, No. 04-76433,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
