 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ayanian v. Gonzales, No. 03-73270,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Buckley v. Presley, No. 04-16576,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a § 1983 case alleging a violation of the Eighth Amendment, a reasonable jury could infer that prison officials acted with deliberate indifference from inmate's allegations that they forced him to stand in a weave mesh metal cage for 11 hours wearing nothing but an athletic supporter, and ignored his repeated requests for water and medical care.
|
|||||
| Castro-Ramirez v. Gonzales, No. 04-74049,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In asylum case, substantial evidence supported IJ's finding that alien failed to establish either past persecution or well-founded fear of future persecution on account of an enumerated ground as he did not demonstrate that gang members assaulted him, even in part, because of an enumerated ground, rather than because he refused to join their gang.
|
|||||
| Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Lockyer, No. 03-55166, No. 03-55169,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Deroche v. Ariz. Indus. Comm'n. (In re Deroche), No. 04-15258,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Chapter 7 bankruptcy debtors were not entitled to recover attorney's fees under Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-348 incurred in defending whether or not a claim had priority status because attorney's fees were not recoverable in bankruptcy for litigating issues peculiar to federal bankruptcy law.
|
|||||
| Durand v. United States Customs, No. 05-55472,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The district court did not err by dismissing the plaintiffs' claims that a warehouse committed conversion and violated a warehouseman's lien, because the plaintiffs did not assert a warehouseman's lien, and the warehouse was not responsible for selling the car.
|
|||||
| Ellis v. Multnomah County, No. 05-35083,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ferren v. United States DOI, No. 04-35870,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Former employers' summary judgment motion was properly granted on former employee's discrimination and retaliation claims as evidence did not show that 1) employers transferred him to less desirable location and then terminated him based on his gender and age; or 2) his employers were aware of his whistleblowing activities when he was transferred.
|
|||||
| Filion v. Churchill County, No. 05-15094,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
