|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
Federal Courts -
9th Circuit Court of Appeals - January 18, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Mascorro v. Gonzales, No. 05-72854,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The denial of aliens' cancellation of removal application, 8 U.S.C.S. § 1229b, was improper where although the IJ recited the proper standard, i.e., that hardship to relatives should be considered cumulatively, a review of her opinion showed that she considered only individual hardships while failing to consider that hardship cumulatively.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Miguel v. Inland Paperboard & Packaging, Inc., No. 05-16324,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where a former employee sued his former employer, claiming that the employer violated Cal. Lab. Code § 512(a) by failing to provide a 30-minute off-duty meal period, his motion to remand was improperly denied because § 301 of the LMRA, 29 U.S.C.S. § 185, did not preempt Cal. Lab. Code § 512 claims as the rights thereunder were non-negotiable.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
