 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Sanders v. Trammel, No. 05-15463,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Schlecht v. Am. Power Pull Corp., No. 04-35785,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Singh v. Gonzales, No. 04-74114,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sprint PCS Assets, L.L.C. v. City of La Canada Flintridge, No. 05-55014,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: La Canada Flintridge, Cal., Ordinance 324 was invalid because it was preempted by Cal. Pub. Util. Code §§ 7801, 7901.1; a city did not have the regulatory authority to deny permits for a wireless facility based on aesthetics. The ordinance was not saved by 47 U.S.C.S. § 332(c)(7)(A) because it was invalid under state law.
|
|||||
| Tucker v. City of L.A., No. 04-55300,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because plaintiff's state law claims had been dismissed before he raised the arguments, he could not litigate his unconstitutional ordinance theory under the state law claims when they were resurrected by the appellate court's March 31, 2003 disposition.
|
|||||
| United States v. Andrade, No. 04-50203,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Awbery, No. 04-30284,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Baltazar-Garcia, No. 04-10499,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Blanton, No. 04-30264,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
