 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Borcena v. United States, No. 04-56772,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Broemer v. California, No. 04-57117,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Burotto v. Cont'l Cas. Co., No. 04-55180,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Davidson v. Wakefield, No. 04-15951,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Esparza v. Gonzales, No. 04-71775,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sweeney v. Barnhart, No. 04-35403,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court upheld the denial of claimant's application for Social Security disability insurance benefits; based on the medical records and the claimant's daily activities, an ALJ was entitled to reject the claimant's assessment of the extent of the limitations imposed by her carpal tunnel syndrome.
|
|||||
| Tadeo-Hernandez v. Gonzales, No. 05-71383,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court dismissed for lack of jurisdiction a petition for review of a decision denying aliens cancellation of removal. Per 8 U.S.C.S. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), the discretionary determination that aliens failed to establish that their removal would impose an exceptional and extremely unusual hardship on their U.S. citizen children was unreviewable.
|
|||||
| United States Commer. Mortg. Co. v. Lowe Enters. Residential Investors, No. 04-15855,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Anderson, No. 04-10547,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court's statement that defendant never waived his right to appeal an unlawful sentence did not overcome his explicit appellate waiver in the plea agreement and allow him to raise Booker issues on appeal because the statement was made after the district court accepted the plea and imposed sentence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
