 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Ruiz, No. 05-50554,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Ninth Circuit precedent precluded defendant's arguments that retroactive application of Booker to a defendant who committed her offense before that decision issued violated the ex post facto protection of the Due Process Clause and the Ex Post Facto Clause of U.S. Const. art. I, § 9.
|
|||||
| United States v. Runner, No. 04-30227,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Saldana-Lopez, No. 05-50483,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Serafin, No. 02-10650,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions for possession and conspiracy to possess methamphetamine in violation 21 U.S.C.S. §§ 841(a)(1), (6) and 846 were supported by sufficient evidence of his connection to the drug conspiracy, including his counter-surveillance during his co-conspirator's drug transactions and his financing of one drug transaction.
|
|||||
| United States v. Soza-Balderama, No. 05-30069,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court affirmed defendant's 51-month sentence for having violated 8 U.S.C.S. § 1326(a). District court systematically considered all the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) in setting the sentence and did not, as defendant argued, consider only the number of defendant's prior convictions.
|
|||||
| United States v. Tersero-Aguilar, No. 05-50437,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Willis, No. 05-30031,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly held that police officers had probable cause to arrest defendant. Thus, court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress evidence seized as a result of the arrest; officer explained why, based on his experience, he believed a plastic bag that he saw "flying" toward him, apparently tossed by defendant, contained drugs.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
