 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Cardenas-Olvera, No. 04-50506,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Carreno, No. 04-50042,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Collins, No. 99-17361,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Contreras-Coria, No. 04-30534,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Doe, No. 05-10218,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the United States explained that it struck an African-American juror because the prosecutor was concerned that the juror's medical conditions might be distracting to her, the record supported the district court's holding that defendant did not prove purposeful discrimination in the United States' use of its peremptory challenge.
|
|||||
| United States v. Elliott, No. 05-50271,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Fabian-Chavez, No. 05-30000,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Giron-Soria, No. 04-50540,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Admission of videotape evidence in defendant's trial for bringing an alien into the U.S. was not an abuse of discretion because it was not offered for the truth of the statements asserted therein, a limiting instruction minimized prejudice, and there were no Confrontation Clause concerns when the statements were not testimonial hearsay evidence.
|
|||||
| United States v. Guerrero-Velasquez, No. 05-30066,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court misapplied the modified categorical approach in sentencing defendant under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) (2003); it could have properly taken judicial notice that he was convicted of burglarizing a dwelling since by pleading guilty he had admitted to burglarizing a dwelling.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
