 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Reyes-Junes, No. 04-50527,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Roalsen, No. 04-30332,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Virgen-Ruelas, No. 05-10030,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Virrueta, No. 03-50161,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court affirmed defendant's 120-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C.S. § 841(a)(l). Defendant was sentenced to a statutory minimum sentence under § 841(b)(l)(A), so a remand for resentencing due to Booker error was not necessary; resentencing could not result in a different sentence.
|
|||||
| United States v. Wei Jun Chen, No. 04-10141, No. 04-10164,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| United States v. Zanghi, No. 05-50643,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Vazquez v. Gonzales, No. 04-71610,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where alien testified that he returned to Mexico briefly to visit his ailing mother and that, upon his attempted reentry into the U.S., he was stopped, fingerprinted, and allowed to return to Mexico, alien's "turn-around" at the border did not constitute a break in his continuous presence in the U.S. for purposes of 8 U.S.C.S. § 1229b(b)(1)(A).
|
|||||
| Velarde-Arambula v. Gonzales, No. 04-70277,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the court could not tell whether alien's contacts with immigration officials were "turn-arounds" rather than "administrative voluntary departures"--a distinction critical to finding that there was break in alien's continuous physical presence in U.S.--the court remanded for further proceedings alien's application for cancellation of removal.
|
|||||
| Villescas v. Hernandez, No. 04-55900,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Exclusion of evidence that a gun found during an inmate's arrest was planted did not violate due process and warrant habeas relief because its probative value was outweighed by the danger of confusion and it would have bolstered identical trial testimony, making it extremely unlikely that its exclusion had an injurious effect on the verdict.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
