 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Garcia-Rico, No. 04-50137,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C.S. § 846 and possession with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C.S. § 841(a)(1) was affirmed because Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 did not require specific findings before deciding a motion to withdraw a guilty plea.
|
|||||
| United States v. Park, No. 04-10692,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence that defendant's shop sold identical merchandise after she agreed in a civil action not to sell the trademarked goods was sufficient to show knowledge that the goods were counterfeit, show that the trademarks were registered at the time of the conspiracy, and support her conviction for conspiring to traffic in counterfeit merchandise.
|
|||||
| United States v. Perez-Soto, No. 05-30182,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C.S. § 841(a)(1) was supported by sufficient evidence that 79 grams of methamphetamine and a container of a cutting agent were found in his hotel rooms and he had a large amount of cash on his person when arrested.
|
|||||
| United States v. Quinonez, No. 03-30229,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, money laundering, and forfeiture was affirmed because a sentencing enhancement for obstruction of justice under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3C1.1 was proper since the trial court made appropriate and specific findings, which were not clearly erroneous.
|
|||||
| Welther v. Donell (In re Oakmore Ranch Mgmt.), BAP No. CC-05-1168-BKPa,
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Bankruptcy appellate panel affirmed bankruptcy court's order releasing funds that promisor paid into trust to a bankruptcy trustee because a person who owed money to the bankruptcy estate did not show that the court committed clear error when it found he had a beneficial interest in a promissory note, even though his children were named as payees.
|
|||||
| Wilson v. Fairman, No. 04-16019,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A habeas petition was properly denied because a state court did not unreasonably apply clearly established U.S. Supreme Court precedent in deciding that an inmate was not subjected to custodial interrogation in violation of Miranda given the officers' comments that he was free to leave and instructions on how to exit.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
