 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| United States v. Smith, No. 06-50414,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was sufficient evidence in the record to support the district court's denial of early termination of supervised release. The factors under 18 U.S.C.S. § 3553(a) did not exclusively concern rehabilitation. Continued supervised release related to the nature of defendant's offense and his character.
|
|||||
| Valeriano v. Gonzales, No. 03-72277, No. 03-74754,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As there was no unavoidable conflict between simultaneously filing a motion to reopen under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1) and a request to file jointly under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(iii), an alien's counsel did not act diligently by delaying filing until he had received the Government's response; thus, the alien was not entitled to equitable tolling.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
