LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   Federal Courts - 9th Circuit Court of Appeals - January 26, 2006

  
Alvarez-Aceves v. Fasano, No. 03-55203, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1309 v. Laidlaw Transit Servs., No. 05-56567, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In enacting 28 U.S.C.S. § 1453(c)(1), Congress intended to mirror the procedures for taking an appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S. § 1292(b). The court held that a party that sought to appeal under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1453(c)(1) had to comply with the requirements of Fed. R. App. P. 5.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
G.K. Ltd. Travel v. City of Lake Oswego, No. 04-35416, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where city's sign code's pole sign restriction was justified without reference to content of regulated speech, and was narrowly tailored to achieve city's significant interests in aesthetics and traffic safety, court rejected sign owners' argument that sign code, which prevented owners from continuing use of their sign pole, was unconstitutional.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Gilmore v. Gonzales, No. 04-15736, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Government's airline identification policy did not violate airline customer's constitutional rights; customer had actual notice for purposes of due process, Constitution did not guarantee right to travel by any particular form of transportation, Fourth Amendment was not implicated by request for identification, and search option was reasonable.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Daniel, No. 05-50075, No. 05-50079, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Dismissal without prejudice and subsequent reissuance of show cause orders and bench warrants was not full adjudication of issues or final act of district court, as it still had to adjudicate merits of defendant's supervised release revocation. Thus, there was no final judgment over which appellate court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1291.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Klar, No. 04-30167, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
United States v. Minehart, No. 05-30292, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a very brief order, the court upheld district court orders denying defendant a continuance and revoking his supervised release. The district court had not modified defendant's sentence when it gave him credit against that sentence for time spent a liberty; thus, defendant was subject to supervised release and conditions of release.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Winters v. Knowles, No. 03-16160, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: State appeals court identified the correct legal standard and considered relevant factors when it determined that state trial court did not deny prisoner due process by failing to hold second competency hearing; there was affirmative evidence of prisoner's competence, and with one exception, his erratic behavior occurred a year before trial.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.