|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
Federal Courts -
9th Circuit Court of Appeals - January 27, 2006
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
United States v. Barut, No. 04-10360,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Court affirmed defendant's conviction for aiding and abetting a drug offense, a violation of 21 U.S.C.S. § 841(a); principal, who testified at trial, opened the door to impeachment by prior inconsistent statements, under Fed. R. Evid. 613, by testifying that he had told police that defendant was innocent.
|
|
| |
United States v. Button, No. 05-30230,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, January 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Based on defendant's prior difficulty in complying with supervised release conditions, district court did not err in choosing imprisonment, 18 U.S.C.S. § 3583(g), rather than continued supervised release, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7B1.4, following defendant's release-condition violation. Twelve-month sentence was not abuse of discretion.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|