|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
Federal Courts -
9th Circuit Court of Appeals - February 12, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Lands Council v. Martin, No. 06-35781,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where the U.S. Forest Service authorized logging, after a forest fire, in three areas of a national forest of dead and dying trees, a preliminary injunction was improperly denied per the National Forest Management Act, 16 U.S.C.S. §§ 1600-1614, as the applicable forest plan stated that no "live" trees could be harvested, including the dying trees.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Ogle v. Stewart, No. 04-17534,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where a state inmate, who tripped over a mattress and was injured, sued, pursuant to 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983, alleging a violation of his Eighth Amendment rights, summary judgment was properly granted in favor of a corrections department director because the inmate failed to demonstrate that the director acted with a sufficiently culpable state of mind.
|
|
| |
|
| |
United States v. Blanton, No. 05-50302, No. 05-50717, No. 05-50752, No. 05-50887,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT, February 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where district court granted Fed. R. Crim. P. 29 motion for acquittal on sentencing enhancement charge under Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C.S. § 924(e), based on finding that juvenile adjudications could not serve as predicate offenses, U.S. Const. amend. V's Double Jeopardy Clause barred Government from appealing under 18 U.S.C.S. § 3731.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|